I am never ceased to be amazed at seeing Scientists make "amazing discoveries" of what should be COMMON SENSE principals.
Look -- the smaller something is, the more of it will exist, nothing ever happens all at once and no group of creatures have ever acted in a singular manner not repeated by others of their species.
So yes-- people migrate in waves of herds just like any other animal. Assuming that humans are singular and only do something once is completely fucking retarded and there was never any evidence of it. Just look at South American and North American Indians -- they are wholely different ethic groups and most certainly not from the same herd migration.
And yes -- life exists elsewhere in this solar system, maybe not intelligent, by there sure as fuck is bacteria to be found. And yes, there is intelligent life out there, but advanced life is far more rare than simple life like bacteria, and therefore harder to find -- Just as Suns are more rare than Planet -- oh, we DON'T KNOW THAT hurrrr durr, we need to find out if there are more planets than Stars -- durrrp.
Why agree these concepts so damn difficult? Why can't we take these as solid theory instead of wild and insane concepts needing to be proven? We have enough empirical evidence of their likelihood that the questions should be to disprove these things.
Assuming something in Nature is singular and non-repeating borders on the ignorance and close-mindedness of Religion.
I don't think you understand how science in general, and science publishing in particular works, really.
It's not that no one thought of it, it's that if you're going to publish it, you'd better have done your homework and have the data and analyses done to accompany your 'wouldn't it be great' or 'COMMON SENSE SUPREMACY!' point. Otherwise it's no better than alien pyramids.
the band colton dixon houston weather dwyane wade the night they drove old dixie down levon oklahoma city bombing
No comments:
Post a Comment