Monday, 17 December 2012

A New Tool Helps Airports Track Disease

Cover Image: December 2012 Scientific American MagazineSee Inside

A new tool helps airports track disease


The next time an illness like SARS threatens to sicken large numbers of people around the world, airports may have a new tool to help them prevent a pandemic. Transportation officials and public health experts are pilot testing a Web site that calculates the risk that passengers coming off any given flight are carrying an emerging infectious disease. With funding from the Transportation Research Board, part of the National Research Council, a team of investigators at the University of Florida used airline traffic figures, disease risk maps and climate data to come up with its online vector-borne disease airline importation risk (VBD-AIR) tool.

Officials can enter the name of the airport they are tracking, the month in question and the disease to be targeted?current choices are all mosquito-borne and include dengue, malaria, yellow fever and chikungunya, which was detected in Florida a few years ago. The result is a network of lines, color-coded by disease risk, that represent flights to the destination airport from all parts of the world.

If a passenger comes into an airport needing medical assistance or ends up at a hospital near the airport, officials need to be able to assess the situation quickly before it gets worse, says Andrew Tatem, an assistant professor in the University of Florida's Emerging Pathogens Institute and the school's department of geography. The VBD-AIR database might help prioritize which travelers coming into an airport should be screened, based on their risk of exposure and the disease's virulence, adds Tatem, one of the researchers who helped to develop the VBD-AIR program, which could also serve as a preventive measure by warning travelers of areas to avoid.

The researchers plan to expand the program to track infectious diseases such as leishmaniasis (found in certain areas of South America, Africa and the Middle East and transmitted by sand fly bites), Rift Valley fever (discovered in Kenya but now has spread to other areas of Africa and the Middle East), and Chagas disease (most commonly caused by insects found in South and Central America).

This article was originally published with the title A Deadly Jet Set.

Source: http://rss.sciam.com/click.phdo?i=7d06f443b3f00e098c29f149827a02f0

santorum drops out bby zimmerman website miami marlins marlins marlins facebook buys instagram

Sunday, 16 December 2012

Reaction To The Proposed Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and ...

The proposed Land Acquisition and Rehabilitation and Resettlement Bill seeks to stipulate that a consensus of at least 80% of the land owners is required for any private project. The percentage becomes 70% if the land is to be developed under public private partnership. Any Government-undertaken project does not require such a consensus.

The proposed Bill further stipulates that if the land is being acquired for urbanization purposes, the Government needs to set aside 20% of the land for the person who is parting with the land. It also says that any unutilized land has to be returned to the land owner. These are certainly positives and in line with the larger purposes that the Bill seeks to address.

One point of doubt would be that the proposed Bill says that the provisions would be applied retrospectively if the award of compensation has not yet been made. By award of compensation, one would assume that the land owner has actually received the funds into his bank account.

If the land owner in question has not accepted or otherwise received payment, it does not count as award of compensation. The implication is that if the land owner has not received compensation for any reason at all, he can bargain for a higher price and thereby hold up the process and also contribute to further land inflation.

The Bill further states that the entire process of land acquisition and award of compensation needs to be completed within five years of date of proposal, else the transaction stands cancelled. While it all seems positive on the surface, the fact is that there is also potential for even more uncertainty in the process of land acquisition.

The idea of the Bill was to ensure that land owners get fair and timely compensation and also resettlement options. However, it would need further tweaking to ensure that there is no potential for land owners to drive up land prices in the bargain ? which, in turn, would mean that the cost of the finished products also rises.

Mayank Saksena, Managing Director ? Kolkata & Head ? Land Services, Jones Lang LaSalle India

?

Copyright?secured?by?Digiprove???2012?Jones?Lang?LaSalle

Source: http://www.joneslanglasalleblog.com/realestatecompass/real-estate/india-real-estate/2012/12/reaction-land-acquisition-bill/

los angeles kings earth day timothy leary jonathan frid pujols watchmen hitch